Black Man Sentenced To Life For Stealing Hedge Clippers May Get Shot At Freedom

An October parole hearing has been set for a Black man sentenced to life in prison after stealing hedge clippers in a 1997 burglary, a sentence Louisiana's Supreme Court upheld despite its chief justice's insistence that the punishment was excessive and rooted in racist law.

In November, a state appellate court held that the sentence for Fair Wayne Bryant, 62, was in accordance with the habitual offender law and, after an earlier appeal failed, no longer subject to review.

The Supreme Court voted 5-1 to let the ruling stand, with five white male justices voting in favor and Chief Justice Bernette Johnson, the court’s only Black member, voting against. A seventh justice, also a white male, was recused. The court issued the decision without comment, but Johnson posted a stinging two-page dissent in which she argued that the sentence was so out of proportion to the crime as to be clearly unconstitutional. Her response drew widespread attention to the case.

In her dissent, Johnson called habitual offender laws “a modern manifestation” of legislation passed after the Civil War to make it easier to convict former slaves and their descendants for minor crimes and sentence them harshly. Those laws, she said, were an attempt to “re-enslave African Americans.”

Bryant drew the harsh sentence after he was convicted of theft in 1997 for stealing the hedge clippers from a store room in a carport at a home in Shreveport. His record already included a 1979 attempted armed robbery conviction — a crime classified as violent under Louisiana — and three subsequent nonviolent crimes: possession of stolen things in 1987; attempted forgery of a $150 check in 1989; and simple burglary in 1992.

In 2000, the state appellate court rejected multiple arguments Bryant made, some involving legal procedures and one argument that the sentence was excessive.

“Defendant has spent very little of his adult life outside of the criminal justice system,” the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeal said in the 2000 ruling, which went on to recount his record. “This litany of convictions and the brevity of the periods during which defendant was not in custody for a new offense is ample support for the sentence imposed in this case.”

Francis Abbott, executive director of the Louisiana Board of Pardons and Committee on Parole, said factors that will go into the seven-member parole committee's decision on whether to free Bryant will include his criminal record; his behavior in prison; whether he has a place to live and any comments from victims.

Abbott said Bryant had applied for parole on July 21 and a three-member administrative committee of the parole committee agreed Wednesday to schedule him for a hearing on Oct. 15.